Image for illustrative purposes only| Country Characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Population (event year) | 16,993,354 |
| Economy Type (2018 Value) | Service-Oriented |
| Income Group (event year) | High |
| GDP Growth | 0.06 |
| GDP per Capita | 12,860.2 |
| GNI per Capita | 20,804 |
| Inequality-Adjusted HDI | 0.661 |
| GINI Coefficient | 51 |
| Proportion of Insured Loss (%) | 18.33% |
| Disaster Load | |
|---|---|
| Damage Severity | 40-60% |
| Economic Loss ($ 2019) | 30,000,000 |
| Fatalities | 547 |
| Displaced | 800,000 |
| Affected Population | 5,540,000 |
| Proportion of Population Affected (%) | 32.601 |
| Recovery Financing | |
|---|---|
| Source of Finance | Equal |
| Governmental Aid ($ 000s) | 110000 |
| Non-Governmental Aid($ 000s) | |
| Total Insured Loss ($ 000s) | 3 |
| Proportion of Insured Loss (%) | Higher Middle |
| Delivery Speed of Finance | >12 Months |
| Adequacy of Finance | Sufficient |
| Role of Insurance in Funding Recovery | Moderate |
| Confidence in Assessment | Medium |
| Disaster Profile | |
|---|---|
| Country | Chile |
| ISO | CHL |
| Disaster Type | Earthquake & Tsunami |
| Disaster Subtype | Earthquake |
| Family | Geophysical |
| Year | 2010 |
| Date | 2010-02-27 |
| Magnitude | Extremely catastrophic damage |
| Locus | Concepción |
| Scale | Regional |
| Disaster Risk Management | |
|---|---|
| Disaster Management Authority | Specially-formed agency |
| Level of Preparedness | Well prepared |
| Public Participation | Extensive |
| Science-Based Decision Making | Established scientific basis |
| Efficacy of Decision Making | Very good |
| Experience of Disasters | Frequent |
| Recovery Outcomes | |
|---|---|
| Economic Recovery Speed | 3-5 Years |
| Economic Recovery Quality | Improved |
| Economy Confidence in Assessment | High |
| Society Recovery Speed | 3-5 Years |
| Amenity Recovery Quality | Improved |
| Safety Recovery Quality | Improved |
| Society Recovery Quality | 4 |
| Society Confidence in Assessment | High |
| Insurance Contribution to Outcome | Moderate |